Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2018, Page: 15-25
High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete- Properties, Advantages and Challenges
Kamal Neupane, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Des Chalmers, Cement and Fly ash Advisory Pty Ltd, Queensland, Australia
Paul Kidd, Cement Australia Pty Ltd, Queensland, Australia
Received: May 15, 2018;       Accepted: Jun. 1, 2018;       Published: Jun. 25, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.am.20180702.11      View  1811      Downloads  452
Geopolymer is a noble material, made from reaction between aluminosilicate compounds and alkali solution which owns a good binding property. In last decades, lots of research and development works have been carried out globally to investigate the engineering, thermal, micro-structural and durability properties of geopolymer concrete as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement. Results from previous works indicated that geopolymer concrete exhibited better mechanical strength and durability properties than ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete. Nowadays, high-strength concrete is increasingly used in major civil construction works, such as high-rise buildings and bridges because of its structural and economic benefits over normal-strength concrete. This paper reports the experimental results on engineering properties of high-strength geopolymer concretes of 65 and 80 MPa using geopolymer binders at ambient curing conditions. High-strength concrete produced in this study was able to set quickly in ambient conditions therefore can attain sufficient strength at early days as well as exhibited higher tensile and flexural strength than concrete from OPC. High-strength geopolymer concrete can be produced with very simple mix design; however, it has some limitation for commercial applications. This paper discusses about the advantages and limitations of geopolymer high-strength concrete for its application in concrete industry.
Geopolymer, High-Strength Concrete, Workability and Mechanical Strengths
To cite this article
Kamal Neupane, Des Chalmers, Paul Kidd, High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete- Properties, Advantages and Challenges, Advances in Materials. Vol. 7, No. 2, 2018, pp. 15-25. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20180702.11
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Meyer, C., The greening of the concrete industry. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009 31 (8): p. 601-605.
Davidovits, J., Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1989 35 (2): p. 429-441.
Li, Z., Z. Ding, and Y. Zhang. Development of sustainable cementitious materials. Proceedings of the international workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology. Beijing, May 2004: p.55-76.
Diaz-Loya, I. E., E. N. Allouche, and S. Vaidya, Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 2011 108 (3): p. 300-306.
Hardjito, D. and B. V. Rangan, Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia, 2005.
Sofi, M., et al., Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cement and Concrete Research, 2007 37 (2): p. 251-257.
Puertas, F., et al., Alkali-activated fly ash/slag cements: strength behaviour and hydration products. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000 30 (10): p. 1625-1632.
Bashir, I., K. Kapoor, and H. Sood, An Experimental Investigation on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, 2017 6(3): p. 33-36.
Ryu, G. S., et al., The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 47: p. 409-418.
Fernandez-Jimenez, A. M., A. Palomo, and C. Lopez-Hombrados, Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 2006, 103(2): p. 106-112.
Rovnaník, P., Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 2010, 24(7): p. 1176-1183.
Ahmed, M. F., M. F. Nuruddin, and N. Shafiq, Compressive strength and workability characteristics of low-calcium fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 2011 5(2): p. 64-70.
Deb, P. S., P. Nath, and P. K. Sarker, The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Materials & Design, 2014 62: p. 32-39.
Parthiban, K., et al., Effect of Replacement of Slag on the Mechanical Properties of Fly ash Based Geopolymer Concrete. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET), 2013 5(3): p. 2555- 2559.
Li, Z. and S. Liu, Influence of slag as additive on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer. Journal of Materials in civil engineering, 2007 19(6): p. 470-474.
Catalfamo, P., et al., Influence of the calcium content on the coal fly ash features in some innovative applications. Resources, Conservation and recycling, 1997 20(2): p. 119-125.
Yip, C. K., G. C. Lukey, and J. S. J. van Deventer, The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005 35(9): p. 1688-1697.
Oh, J. E., et al., The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010 40(2): p. 189-196.
ACI-363R, Report on High-Strength Concrete. 2010, ACI Committee 363, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
AS-1379, Specification and supply of concrete. 2007, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
Mazloom, M., A. A. Ramezanianpour, and J. J. Brooks, Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004 26(4): p. 347-357.
Elahi, A., et al., Mechanical and durability properties of high performance concretes containing supplementary cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2010 24(3): p. 292-299.
Johari, M. A. M., et al., Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on engineering properties of high strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2011 25(5): p. 2639-2648.
Dilger, W. H. and C. Wang. Effects of w/c, superplasticizers and silica fume on the development of heat of hydration and strength of HPC. Proceedings of Fourth Weimar Workshop on High Performance Concrete, Weimar, Germany, 1995.
Teychenné, D. C., et al., Building Research Establishment-Design of Normal Concrete Mixes. 2nd ed. 1997, Construction Research Communications Ltd., London, England.
AS-103. 1, Methods of testing concrete; Method 3. 1: Determination of the properties related to the consistency of concrete- Slump test. 1998, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
AS-109, Methods of testing concrete; Method 9: Determination of the compressive strength of concrete specimens. 1999, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
AS-1010, Methods of testing concrete; Method 10: Determination of indirect tensile strength of concrete cylinders (Brazil or splitting test) 2000, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
AS-1011, Methods of testing concrete; Method 11: Determination of the modulus of rupture. 2000, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
AS-1013, Methods of testing concrete; Method 13: Determination of the drying shrinkage of the concrete samples prepared in the field or in the laboratory. 1992, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
AS-1017, Methods of testing concrete; Method 17: Determination of the static cord modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete specimens 1997, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
Brooks, J. J., M. A. Johari, and M. Mazloom, Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2000 22(4): p. 293-301.
Pu, X.C., et al., Summary reports of research on alkali-activated slag cement and concrete. Chongqing Institute of Architecture and Engineering, Chongqing, 1988: p. 1-6.
Wang, S.-D., et al., Alkali-activated slag cement and concrete: a review of properties and problems. Advances in Cement Research, 1995 7(27): p. 93-102.
Neupane, K., et al., Investigation on compressive strength development and drying shrinkage of ambient cured powder-activated geopolymer concretes. Australian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016 14(1): p. 72-83.
Kirschner, A. and H. Harmuth, Investigation of geopolymer binders with respect to their application for building materials. Ceramics-Silikáty, 2004 48: p. 117-120.
AS-3600, Concrete Structures. 2009, Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
Carrasquilio, R. L., A. H. Nilson, and F. O. Slate. Properties of high strength concrete subject to short-term loads. ACI Journal Proceedings. 1981 78(3): p. 171-177.
Iravani, S., Mechanical properties of high-performance concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 1996 93(5): p. 416-425.
Nath, P. and P. K. Sarker, Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2017 130: p. 22-31.
Davidovits, J. Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. Proceedings-'99 Geopolymer International Conference, Saint-Quentin, France, 1999 99: p. 9-39.
Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete. 4th ed. 1995: Addison Wesley Longman limited, London, England.
Douglas, E., A. Bilodeau, and V. M. Malhotra, Properties and durability of alkali-activated slag concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 1992 89(5): p. 509-516.
Wallah, S. E. and B. V. Rangan, Low calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete–Long term properties. Res. Report-GC2, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, 2006.
Deb, P. S., P. Nath, and P. K. Sarker, Drying shrinkage of slag blended fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Procedia Engineering, 20015 125: p. 594-600.
Ballim, Y. and P. C. Graham, The effects of supplementary cementing materials in modifying the heat of hydration of concrete. Materials and Structures, 2009 42(6): p. 803-811.
Abdel-Jawad, Y. A., The maturity method: Modifications to improve estimation of concrete strength at later ages. Construction and building materials, 2006 20(10): p. 893-900.
Khatri, R. P., V. Sirivivatnanon, and W. Gross, Effect of different supplementary cementitious materials on mechanical properties of high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995 25(1): p. 209-220.
Sen, N., A Report on Thermal Characteristic of Geopolymer Concrete, Industrial Affiliates Program 2011, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Fernandez-Jimenez, A., I. García-Lodeiro, and A. Palomo, Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials. Journal of Materials Science, 2006 42(9): p. 3055-3065.
Reddy, D. V., et al. Experimental Evaluation of the Durability of Fly Ash-based geopolymer Concrete in the Marine Environment. 9th Latin American & Caribbean Conference, Medellin, Colombia. 2011.
Sathia, R., K. G. Babu, and M. Santhanam. Durability study of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Proceedings of the 3rd ACF International Conference-ACF/VCA, Vietnam 2008.
Arbi, K., Durability of geopolymer concrete. 2016, Delf University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. p. 1-19.
Czarnecki, B. Delayed Ettringite Formation (DEF) in Precast Concrete Fear, Facts and Risks. Annual Conference of Transportation Association of Canada, 2016 Toronto, Canada, 2016.
Hime, W. G., Delayed Ettringite Formation-A Concern for Precast Concrete? PCI Journal, 1996 41(4): p. 26-30.
Gourley, J. and G. Johnson. Developments in geopolymer precast concrete. World Congress Geopolymer, Amiens, France, 2005.
Browse journals by subject